Synth Site: Kurzweil: K2500 RS: User reviews Add review
Average rating: 4.7 out of 5
page 1 of 6:        1  2  3  4  5  6  >>>
dale Henson a professional user from Myrtle Beach SC writes:
I have the K2500R rack and a K2500RS rack and I could not do without them.But I have a question does anyone know where I could find a battery compartment cover for my K2500RS rack? If anyone knows that would be a grat help Thanks

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Friday-Feb-25-2011 at 12:08
Mark Nicewander from Daytona Beach writes: Podcasting Live RSS feeds Jamroom 250 MB of your music and more berklee instructors in guitars bass drums free memberships live chat games myspace profiles!! Join NOW!!

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Friday-Sep-01-2006 at 19:36
[A][D][D] a professional user from USA writes:
VAST is awesome! The possiblities of this thing are endless. Although I mainly use mine to sequence my other gear, the onboard sounds are quite good, and the possiblities for creating your own are virtually limitless. It has a very 'dark' sound compared to other workstations like the Motif series. The sampler is excellent too, and it's got more i/o options than any other workstation available, and it's 10 years old! Awesome synth, I'd only sell it to get the newer K2600. This thing is a beast!

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Saturday-Jan-28-2006 at 10:27
synthmaniac a professional user from US writes:
VAST is a good technology, and Kurzweil samples are pretty good, but its worst problem is polyphony - only 48? I sold this for a Yamaha Motif ES with 128 notes polyphony. Though ES doesn't have VAST, I love its organic sounds and synth effects. I may get the new Kurzweil PC 161 just to add the Kurzweil sounds to the mix!

Rating: 3 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Dec-07-2005 at 10:59
a hobbyist user from USA writes:
Best synth I've ever used. V.A.S.T. is amazing and the the 48-voice polyphony is a big improvement over the 24-voice K2000 (which is also a great synth). Why bother with any other brands? Kurzweil has the best sound and is the most versatile.

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Sunday-Dec-04-2005 at 15:14
page 1 of 6:        1  2  3  4  5  6  >>>