Roland MC-303 User reviews -Page 321

Synth Site: Roland: MC-303: User reviews Add review

Average rating: 3.7 out of 5

page 65 of 66: <<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 >>>

Rama a professional user from Hell writes:

Stop picking on the MC. I got myself a record deal with it... If you use it as a drummachine, nothing can stand up to it. And by the way...the Rave-O-Lution...oh, my. Over-rated monophonic cack.

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Thursday-Aug-06-1998 at 00:12

Gabriel Rossi a part time user from usa writes:

I like the ease of the mc-303 but it tends to be restricting. I don't like being told what sounds to use. All the music out there is starting to sound the same. If this keeps up, (with the help of roland dumping all the same gear with the same sounds on the market and ruining the originality of the performer), techno will soon be known as muzak. The D-beam is cool and all but it is just too easy. Lets go back to the late eighties with hardware sequencers and a sampler. Thats where its at!! thanks. gabe

Rating: 0 out of 5 posted Thursday-Aug-06-1998 at 00:12

Nick Griffin a 0 user from USA writes:

c'mon guys quit comparing sequencers, if they sound different then the person

hearing them should choose between them,the rave o lution is bad ass ,hell

even kmfdm swears by the thing, but really the no creativity thing with the groovebox is rediculous use the mc303 for your basic sequencer,then all you

have to do is flip it upside down in any editing program, hell i could make an ry10's

bass lines sound good with turbo synth, creativity and being an artist depends

on how you can take a sound and mold it into your own expression,hell

all electric guitars have the same basic sound and millions of bands have made each and every one different sounding from the next, if your too stupid too

realize that the mc303 can be used for more than the box is worth,go pay 2000

some dollars for a rave o lution or have fun rumagging through peoples trash for a

tb303..

damn i wish there were more than five marks

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Thursday-Aug-06-1998 at 00:12

Andrew a part time user from USA writes:

I have never used the MC-303, but apparently it doesn't sound much like a TB...? Well to all of you who suggested buying ReBirth, I must agree it's a great program, but......... $179 for a TB emulator?????????????? Tweaking knobs with a mouse is NOT FUN, especially when performing. The only advantage I can see is that it gives you 2 TB's at a time to mess with. This is totally outweighed by the MASSIVELY uncool mouse-computer interface. Yeah, it sounds great but you just can't control it the way you can with a hands-on machine. I know TB's are real expensive, and I know this has been suggested before, but Syntecno makes a TOTALLY FUCKING AWESOME TB clone called TeeBee. My friend has one, and I plan to get one ASAP!!! Just like TB, but with more waveforms, MIDI stuff, and more bellz'n'whistles. SOUNDS GREAT THOUGH!! Well thats my 2 bitz. BTW if there is anyway to control ReBirth without a mouse, let me know! (can you use an external trigger...?)

Rating: 0 out of 5 posted Thursday-Aug-06-1998 at 00:12

Da BassMaster a hobbyist user from holland writes:

this little silver box is my first piece of equipment and I just love it!! OK, it is a bit difficult to use with midi and changing sounds is limited, but for a small price you get an INCREDIBLE drummachine, sequencer and a small synth. but when you're too stupid to make good music (techno) with it, don't blame the machine! Just buy a sampler and make songs from those 'original' sample CD's.

Rating: 4 out of 5 posted Thursday-Aug-06-1998 at 00:12

More Stories: