Synth Site: Soft/Virtual/Cards: AudioSim v1.91: User reviews Add review
Average rating: 4.3 out of 5
page 1 of 1:        1 
Dunbar a part-time user from UK writes:
This is a great little synth. I've been using it for 11 years and i never tire of it. If you want dirty analogue squalls or smooth retro strings this synth has got it covered. If you ever lose momentum in a project and need inspiration just hit the randomize button! instant Sonic mayhem (or silence - just remember turn the volume back up). I keep an old win98 box hooked upto Sonar via midi just for this synth. Highly recommended.

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Thursday-Jan-29-2009 at 12:15
Jim Taika a hobbyist user from Finland writes:
i think that this is still one of the best softsynths available. Maybe it sounds so good just because its DOS synth.. and its fast too. Better than Reaktor or anything! I only have demoversion of this, its fully functional but cant save sounds.. so i can only create samples with it.. =/ If you have full vers. yeah, you know how the story goes.. =) peace!

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Friday-May-31-2002 at 21:22
Rabi a hobbyist user from California USA writes:
Wow, the other guy gae it a 2 ? I love this softsynth. Runs in dos I believe but so what. If you have a dedicated box for all of your softsynths than this really isnt an issue. I find that this softsynth has killer timbre. quite amazing really. Dont let this sleeper get past you.

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Tuesday-Jan-09-2001 at 10:25
Michael Rall a professional user from USA writes:
Not bad for a software synth, but the MIDI implementation leaves a LOT to be desired... Over all, good sounds. Solid, nice filters! The sequencer is a bit buggy, but check out that nifty little arpeggiator. OK, so the arpy isn't very complex. Hey, whaddaya expect for 20 bucks? If you want to make REAL music, buy a REAL musical instrument you cheap bastard! This thing is quickly becoming my favorite "rainy day and I don't feel like getting up and walking into the music room" toy. Hey, it's cheaper than "REALITY" and not nearly as disappointing...

Rating: 2 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Aug-05-1998 at 23:35
page 1 of 1:        1